A new reparcelación project in preparation
This meeting was attended by:
- Ana Paixà – Town Hall Lawyer
- Joan Mª Rovira Vernet – Mayor (JxCAT-JUNTS)
- Izaskun – Town Hall Secretary
- Jose Maria Rovira – Council Member (JxCAT-JUNTS)
- Jordi Pagan – Council Member (JxCAT-JUNTS)
- Amadeu Paune – Council Member (JxCAT-JUNTS)
- Toni Marco – Council Member (JxCAT-JUNTS)
- Glòria Moreno – Council Member (AvP)
- Jose Pescador – Council Member (AvP)
- Evelynne Planet – President of AvP
- Christian Peuman – Former President of the EUCC
- Marie-Jo – Friend of Mr. Peuman
- Meritxell – Representative of Unidos por Planas 2019
- Leonardo Meriz – Representative of Unidos por Planas 2019
Ms. Ana Paixà, Town Hall Lawyer, informed the attendees of the municipal intention to revive a modified reparcelación project, better suited to current needs and more financially realistic. She also indicated that the Town Hall wishes to begin renovation work in Planas as soon as possible.
At the same time, the creation of a cooperation entity was proposed to allow property owners to participate in the process. The Town Hall also invited the designation of representatives to jointly work on revising the project and monitoring the works.
Pending implementation of the project, all owners will be required to pay an urban development fee to cover maintenance costs of the urbanization.
Several participants expressed their concerns. Nevertheless, Ms. Paixà insisted: the project will go ahead, with or without the participation of the owners. She asked for the cooperation of the former EUCC president to assess the real maintenance costs and to determine the future contribution quotas.
Questions and objections from Avança Pratdip representatives
In response to our questions, Ms. Paixà said:
- The registration period for the project is not defined, but she stated it would be short, despite the opposing view of our councilor Jose Pescador, whom she advised not to listen to.
- It is also not specified how long owners will have to pay the development fee, except “until the works are completed”.
Mr. Pescador expressed concern that this vagueness could lead to a situation of indefinite, uncontrolled maintenance fees.
Position of Leonardo Meriz
Mr. Meriz stated that he would challenge any urban development charge linked to the reparcelación imposed on his property.
Ms. Paixà responded firmly: “He will lose, as all the others did, except in the case of the EUCC dissolution.”
He proposed modifying the project first, then registering it. Ms. Paixà refused, arguing it would delay things by two more years.
Joint requests: lighting and green spaces
AvP and Mr. Meriz agreed to request that the Town Hall immediately take charge of green areas and public lighting.
A new meeting is scheduled within 15 days.
AvP calls for a strategic meeting
AvP council members consider it essential to urgently convene the entire group to define a strategy for upcoming negotiations with the Town Hall and other political groups.
Legal analysis: response from Jordi Barquín
In light of the situation, AvP consulted its lawyer, Mr. Jordi Barquín. Here are his initial conclusions:
- He noted in Ms. Paixà’s statements a tacit acknowledgment of the dissolution of the EUCC: “excepto el de la eliminación de la EUCC”.
- He recalled that in 2018 the Town Hall appealed the enforcement judgment of July 20 and 21, 2016, arguing a contradiction between the two.
- However, the July 21, 2016 ruling clearly stated that the EUCC was dissolved on that date.
- To this day, the TSJC Court of Appeal has not yet ruled on that appeal, which has been pending since February 2020.
Finally, Mr. Barquín stated:
- “A new EUCC cannot legally be created.”
- The Town Hall is considering a collaborative model, but according to him, the facilities are public and no longer subject to a private conservation entity.
- “A so-called collaborative EUCC would be illegal.”
We believe it is essential to share this legal opinion, which clearly rules out the possibility of re-establishing an EUCC in any form.
For the Asociación de Vecinos Les Planes del Rei (SOS Planas)
Gérard Marais
Terminology Note
There is no exact equivalent in English for the Spanish legal term « reparcelación ». It might be tempting to translate it as urban redevelopment or reurbanization, but that would be misleading.
In reality, reparcelación refers to a specific legal and administrative procedure in Spanish urban planning law:
it is a land readjustment process aimed at regrouping and redistributing property parcels within a defined area in order to adapt them to a new urban development plan.This process ensures that urban planning costs and benefits (such as roads, green spaces, and public infrastructure) are equitably shared among property owners.
The most accurate English rendering would be:
“urban land readjustment” or “urban re-parceling”.
In legal contexts, it is also common to keep the original Spanish term (reparcelación) alongside a descriptive explanation.
THIBAUT Gilbert sur 8 avril 2021 à 10 h 55 min
Merci pour les informations et bon courage à ceux qui continuent à défendre Planes del Rey
Claude LESPRILLIER sur 3 avril 2021 à 16 h 21 min
Il existe en Espagne l’équivalent d’un « médiateur de la république » qui se nomme « el defensor del pueblo » (www.defensordelpueblo.es/area/administracion-local), dont les fonctions sont les suivantes :
“Entre las funciones del Defensor del Pueblo está examinar el funcionamiento de las diputaciones provinciales, los entes locales menores (parroquias, pedanías), los plenos municipales y los derechos de los concejales.
La institución supervisa la correcta prestación de los servicios municipales: suministro de agua, alcantarillado, alumbrado, cementerios, instalaciones deportivas y de recreo y gestión del padrón de habitantes. También el estado de los bienes públicos, como son, entre otros, los caminos vecinales, las calles y plazas y el mobiliario urbano.”
Ne pourrions-nous pas nous faire aider ?
thierry dutat sur 30 mars 2021 à 14 h 43 min
Un grand merci pour votre implication.
Alej el 26 marzo 2021 a las 21 h 01 min
Seria un grave error crear otra Ecu. Lo que tiene que hacer el ayuntamiento en un nuevo proyecto de urbanización, sin inflarlo y que dicho gastos lo asuma parte el ayuntamiento (por eso cobra el ibi hace años sin invertir ni un euro en la urbanizacion) y parte los vecinos con un impuesto especial a pagar en bastantes años. Que no pretenda que lo paguemos 100% los vecinos cuando lleva años llenando las arcas con nuestro ibi
Victoria el 26 marzo 2021 a las 11 h 26 min
Para mi lo más importante es el alumbrado público que es una vergüenza ir por las calles sin luz y eso lo tendría que asumir el ayuntamiento,luego ya hablaríamos de lo otro.Planas da verdadero asco,las basuras son vertederos de porquería
JB el 26 marzo 2021 a las 10 h 02 min
El ayuntamiento que haga lo que tenga que hacer y que se olviden de crear entidades colaborativas y ejerzan sus funciones como administración pública que son. La administración esta para ejercer sus competencias entre las cuales se encuentran las territoriales y de servicios para eso cobran. Olvidense de enfrentar vecinos y propietarios en asuntos ajenos a sus obligaciones.
MARC LALOYAUX sur 26 mars 2021 à 19 h 50 min
La mairie nous amuse encore pour gagner du temps. Créer une nouvelle entité il faudrait l’unanimité des propriétaires ce qui est impossible. Par contre elle ne fait jamais état de l’argent qu’elle reçoit chaque année grâce aux propriétaires de Planas. (Taxes foncières et autres, sans oublier les subsides du nucléaire pour chaque personne empadronnée. (Total environ 500.000 euros par an) Que redistribue la mairie à Planas?
Bravo d’avoir pu obtenir de suite l’analyse du compte-rendu de la réunion par Maître BARQUIN.
GIRAUDEAU Didier sur 26 mars 2021 à 10 h 29 min
Ben voyons, on nous propose de payer des taxes (qu’on appelait autrefois des charges) en plus de nos impôts, avec lesquels ils ne font rien, si ce n’est que refaire la rue principale de Pratdip.
Ils nous prennent vraiment pour des imbéciles.
MONJO DIDIER sur 26 mars 2021 à 10 h 12 min
Merci pour tout ce que vous avez fait, ce que vous faites, et ce que vous continuerez à faire.
“TCHIMBE RAID” (tenez bon en créole).
Hélène Marchand Nicolo sur 26 mars 2021 à 16 h 09 min
Planas engendre des frais auprès de la mairie de Pratdip pourquoi Monsieur le Maire n’utilise pas pour nous les dizaines de milliers d’euros qu’il se font sur notre dos grâce à la centrale nucléaire ????
Hanne Damsgaard sur 26 mars 2021 à 10 h 10 min
Apres nos mauvaises expéruences avec l’ancien eucc nous avons pas besoin d’un nouveau!!!La mairie doit prendre ces responsabilités.
Dear Gerard, The endorsement of our position regarding EUCC is essential.” Divide and rule” is not an option. Thank you for maintaining a presence, this is important for the absent owners