[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Section-Article” module_class=”section-article” _builder_version=”4.18.0″ custom_margin=”0px|0px|0px|0px” custom_padding=”0px|0px|0px|0px” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row use_custom_gutter=”on” gutter_width=”1″ admin_label=”Ligne-Article” module_class=”ligne-article et_pb_row_fullwidth” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ width=”100%” width_tablet=”100%” width_phone=”” width_last_edited=”on|desktop” max_width=”100%” max_width_tablet=”100%” max_width_phone=”” max_width_last_edited=”on|desktop” custom_margin=”0px||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”0px||0px||false|false” make_fullwidth=”on” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text admin_label=”Texte-Why SOS Planas is acting today to ensure minimum services” module_class=”txt-article” _builder_version=”4.27.5″ text_font=”|300|||||||” link_font=”|300|||||||” link_text_color=”#000000″ header_font=”||||||||” header_2_line_height=”1.2em” header_3_font=”||||||||” header_3_line_height=”1.3em” header_4_text_align=”center” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” hover_enabled=”0″ text_line_height_tablet=”” text_line_height_phone=”1.3em” text_line_height_last_edited=”on|desktop” header_2_font_size_tablet=”” header_2_font_size_phone=”” header_2_font_size_last_edited=”on|phone” header_3_font_size_tablet=”” header_3_font_size_phone=”23px” header_3_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n
For several years, many property owners in Planas del Rey have been questioning the persistent lack of essential municipal services, despite the steps taken, the meetings held and the court decisions already issued.<\/p>\n
In response to these legitimate questions, SOS Planas wishes to explain clearly, factually and without polemic the reasons that have led the association to initiate today a new legal action against the municipality of Pratdip.<\/p>\n
The action undertaken by SOS Planas focuses on a single point : the legal obligation of the municipality of Pratdip to provide minimum municipal services<\/span> in Planas del Rey.<\/p>\n This includes, in particular, basic maintenance, road infrastructure, public lighting, sanitation and the services essential to a permanently inhabited urbanisation.<\/p>\n The legal action initiated by SOS Planas also aims to ensure that these minimum services are provided before, during and after<\/span> any potential works, so that residents are not, once again, deprived of decent living conditions for several years.<\/p>\n This d\u00e9marche does not concern re-urbanisation, reparcelation, or future projects. Since the dissolution of the EUCC in 2016, confirmed by the courts, responsibility for minimum services lies fully with the municipality of Pratdip.<\/p>\n This point is no longer open to interpretation : the rulings issued have clarified municipal obligations. At the same time, property owners continue to meet their fiscal obligations, notably the IBI, without benefiting from the corresponding services.<\/p>\n Before reaching this step, all other avenues had been explored : letters, exchanges, meetings and formal requests.<\/p>\n The municipality is aware of the situation, aware of its obligations and aware of residents\u2019 expectations. Legal action therefore does not constitute an escalation, but the last legal lever available<\/span> to enforce a right that has already been recognised.<\/p>\n It is important to clarify what this d\u00e9marche does not represent :<\/p>\n Its sole purpose is to guarantee an indispensable minimum, in the interest of all residents.<\/p>\n Failing to act today would have far more serious consequences than initiating legal proceedings.<\/p>\n Accepting inaction means :<\/p>\n
\nIt does not seek to open a new political debate, but to ensure the application of an existing legal framework.<\/p>\n
\nA now clearly established legal context<\/h2>\n
\nHowever, despite this clearly established legal situation, no lasting and lawful improvement has been implemented.<\/p>\n
\nWhy take legal action today ?<\/h2>\n
\nHowever, in the absence of an effective legal constraint, commitments remain without concrete follow-up.<\/p>\n
\nWhat this action is not<\/h2>\n
\n
\nThe risk of inaction<\/h2>\n